The 2026 legislative session is over, and Salt Lakers can finally stop holding their breath. While last year's meeting of lawmakers put a target on the capital city's back, this year was a bit more friendly. Still, some bills kept locals on their toes.
- What it does: Requires SLC (and only SLC) to get approval from the Utah Dept. of Transportation to improve safety on certain streets through traffic-calming measures, like bike/bus lanes.
- More context: The city has a major goal to end traffic-related fatalities by 2035, and advocates say the way to do that is to slow traffic. There's also language in the bill to "mitigate the impacts" of recently constructed bike/bus lanes on 200 South, 300 West, and 400 South, though it's unclear what that could look like.
- Status: ✅ Passed and headed to the governor's desk
- What it does: Renames 900 South aka Harvey Milk Boulevard in Salt Lake City to Charlie Kirk Boulevard.
- More context: Rep. Trevor Lee, R-Layton, said he wanted to recognize the impact of right-wing pundit Charlie Kirk, who was killed at Utah Valley University last fall. Local businesses and residents opposed the proposal and said the street honoring LGBTQ activist Harvey Milk was part of their identity as a welcoming place.
- Status: ❌ Failed and never even got a hearing
Homeless Campus Proposals
- A big surprise: The Legislature didn't fund the 1,300-bed homeless campus planned for Salt Lake City's west side and in fact reappropriated the $23 million it had previously set aside for the massive project.
- More context: Senate Minority Leader Luz Escamilla pitched legislation to get representation for Westside residents (her constituents) on the Homeless Services Board. After its first vote in the Senate it didn't go anywhere.
- Status: 😵💫 Confusion over what the heck is happening with the campus
Verdict: Overall, it seems like SLC came away mostly unscathed. Mayor's Office spokesperson Andrew Wittenberg said the city appreciates the "relationships and mutual respect" it has with lawmakers and is "grateful for the statewide focus of the Utah Legislature during the 2026 general session.”
My analysis of that comment? "😮💨"
